Therapeutic urbanism: Public art as a tool and a method
Keywords:
соучастие, public art, urban semiotics, local identity, Almetyevsk, Tales of Golden Apples, participationAbstract
The present essay is devoted to the formulation and analytical interpretation of the phenomenon of “therapeutic urbanism” as a specific method of engaging with the post- Soviet urban environment. The focus of the study is not on individual artistic practices, but on a constellation of scholarly, spatial, architectural, and symbolic approaches aimed at addressing collective trauma, the loss of identity, and the absence of emotional bonds between individuals and place. In the first part of the essay, I clarify a number of concepts related to trends in street art and emphasize the importance of an integrated approach to the development of public art programs, which directly influence the formation of emotionally rich urban environments. Therapeutic urbanism is approached here as a philosophical and methodological category that enables the analysis of processes transforming the urban fabric. Its relationship to existing urban theories is examined, including concepts of reasonable urbanism, the right to the city, and semiotic analyses of urban space.In the second part, therapeutic urbanism is explored through the case of the long-term program Tales of Golden Apples (Almetyevsk, 2017–2023), which is understood as a laboratory for the development and testing of this method. Drawing on spatial design practices, folklore-anthropological and ethnobotanical research, participatory frameworks, and the institutional consolidation of outcomes, the essay demonstrates how the urban environment can function as a space of symbolic “healing.” This occurs through the replacement of traumatizing sign systems, the restoration of connections to local history and natural contexts, and the formation of sustainable communities. Particular attention is paid to working with “non-ideal” environments, rejecting tabula rasa approaches, and recognizing conflictual and painful reactions from residents as an integral part of the collective process of working through trauma. As a result, the article for the first time formulates the key principles of therapeutic urbanism as an interdisciplinary method for long-term urban development and for the formation of sustainable emotional and social ties.Downloads
References
Андерсон, Б. (2001). Воображаемые сообщества. М.: Канон-Пресс-Ц.
Дебор, Г. (2000). Общество спектакля. М.: Логос.
Ёж, П. Г., Чусова, А. А. (2025). Паблик-арт проект как поликодовое семиотическое образование в пространстве города. Медиалингвистика, (12), 449–453.
Вильчинская-Бутенко, М. Э. (2022). Режимы визуализации урбанистического искусства: стрит-арт vs паблик-арт. Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение, (47), 18–34.
Карцева, Е. А. (2023). Визуальный облик города и городская коммуникация средствами паблик-арта: российский опыт. Наука телевидения, 19(1), 13–78.
Котломанов, А. О. (2015). Паблик-арт: страницы истории. Современное русское искусство в общественном пространстве. Часть 1. Монументальная скульптура. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Искусствоведение, (4), 55–65.
Петров, Н. В., Вятчина, М. В., Доронин, Д. Ю., Елагина, В. С., Савина, Н. А., Юзекаева, А. М. (2018). Локальные тексты города: нарративы и практики жителей: Альметьевск. Аналитический отчет. М. (Рукопись).
Петров, Н. В. (2019). Локальный текст, фольклор и паблик-арт в нефтяном моногороде: Альметьевск. Фольклор и антропология города, II (3–4), 74–105.
Петров, Н. В., Елагина, В. С., Доронин, Д. Ю., Юзекаева, А. М., Новопашенная, Э. И., Асхадуллин, А. А. (2020). Заметки к энциклопедии народной культуры юго-востока Татарстана и развитие программы «Сказки о золотых яблоках» в г. Альметьевск в 2020–2023 гг. Аналитический отчет исследовательской группы и результаты фольклорно-антропологической экспедиции 15–23 мая 2019 г. М. (Рукопись).
Серр, М. (2022). Договор с природой. СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге.
Ушакин, С. (Сост.). (2009). Травма: пункты. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.
Bass, A. (2000). Difference and disavowal: The trauma of eros. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Benninger, C. (2011). Letters to a young architect. New Delhi: India House Art Gallery.
Schacter, R. (2017). Street art is a period. Period (Or, classificatory confusion and intermural art). Graffiti and street art: Reading, writing and representing the city, 103–118.
Thompson, N. (2012). Living as form: Socially engaged art from 1991–2011. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Petrov, N. V., Elagina, V. S., Doronin, D. Yu., Yuzevaeva, A. M., Novopashennaia, E. I., Askhadullin, A. A. (2020). Notes for the encyclopedia of folk culture ofthe southeast of Tatarstan and the development of the “Tales of golden apples” program in Almetyevsk in 2020–2023. Analytical report of the research group and results of the folklore-anthropological expedition of May 15–23, 2019. Moscow. (Manuscript). (In Russian).
Petrov, N. V., Viatchina, M. V., Doronin, D. Yu., Elagina, V. S., Savina, N. A., Yuzevaeva, A. M. (2018). Local texts of the city: narratives and practices of residents: Al- metyevsk. Analytical report. Moscow. (Manuscript). (In Russian).
Schacter, R. (2017). Street art is a period. Period (Or, classificatory confusion and intermural art). Graffiti and street art: Reading, writing and representing the city, 103–118.
Serr, M. (2022). The covenant with nature. St. Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. (In Russian).
Thompson, N. (2012). Living as form: Socially engaged art from 1991–2011. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ushakin, S. (Comp.). (2009). Trauma: points. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
Vilchinskaia-Butenko, M. E. (2022). Regimes of visualization of urban art: street art vs public art. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiia i iskusstvovedenie, (47), 18–34. (In Russian).
