Orbituary as an institutional statement

Authors

  • K.A. Onipko The Propp Centre for Humanities-based research in the Sphere of Traditional Culture Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2025-7-1-14-36

Keywords:

obituary, cemetery, biography, institute, involvement, memory

Abstract

For a modern individual, identifying and classifying oneself and others through the professional community to which one belongs is highly relevant. In modern obituaries, the working life, public service, and professional qualities of the deceased often overshadow their individual personality traits. As a result, references to profession, involvement in specific organizations, and a list of professional achievements have become distinctive and even integral features of modern obituaries. The procedure for publishing an obituary in a newspaper reflects social hierarchy and denotes the social status of the deceased during their lifetime. The author of an obituary is often presented as a collective voice - representatives of a specific organization. Furthermore, the involvement of the deceased in particular institutions and professional fields is frequently evident in the design of tombstones in modern urban cemeteries. The earthly successes of the deceased are often recorded in the space of the dead, thus immortalizing their achievements. Institutions, therefore, dictate a particular procedure for integrating the deceased into the space of public memory. This article will focus on the ways in which the professional affiliations of the deceased are articulated and their working achievements externalized through an institutionalized set of expressive means and clichés. It will also examine the choice of specific life scenarios used to describe the life of the deceased. The conclusions presented in the article are based on data from a study of obituaries (2000-2015) published in the Tsarskoselskaya Gazeta, the leading print media outlet in the town of Pushkin (a locality within the Pushkinsky District of St. Petersburg), as well as an analysis of early 21st-century tombstones at Kuzminskoye Cemetery, one of the main burial grounds in the town.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Бергер, П., Лукман, Т. (1995). Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М.: Медиум.

Веселова, И. С. Нарратология стереотипной достоверной прозы. Режим доступа: https://folk.ru/Research/veselova_narratolog.php

Дуглас, М. (2020). Как мыслят институты. М.: Элементарные формы.

Матич, О. (2021). Музеи смерти: Парижские и московские кладбища. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.

Онипко, К. А. (2016). Бытование некролога в социальном порядке небольшого города. Археология русской смерти, 2016(2), 155-174.

Онипко, К. А. (2018). Город, горожанин и горожанка в некрологах локальной прессы. В Н. Л. Пушкарева, Н. А. Гронская, Н. К. Радина (Ред.). Горожанки и горожане в политических, экономических и культурных процессах российской урбанизации XIV-XXI веков. Материалы Одиннадцатой международной научной конференции РАИЖИ и ИЭА РАН, 4-7 октября 2018 г., Нижний Новгород, в 2-х томах, 1, 314-315. М.: ИЭА РАН.

Онипко, К. А. (2018). Прагматика некролога: позиция автора. Вестник РГГУ. Серия "История. Филология. Культурология. Востоковедение", 2018(9), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-9-50-60

Орлова, Г. А. (2009). Биография (при)смерти: заметки о советском политическом некрологе. Неприкосновенный запас, 2009(2). Режим доступа: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2009/2/biografiya-pri-smerti-zametkio-sovetskom-politicheskom-nekrologe.html

Сафронов, Е. В. (2009). Актуализация dream-telling в похоронно-поминальном обряде (на материале Ульяновской области). Вестник РГГУ. Серия "Литературоведение. Фольклористика", 2009(9), 159-168.

Шерстобитов, К. А. (2015). "Дополнительная информация" на памятниках: анализ оформления материально-архитектурного знакового пространства на примере городских кладбищ Кимр и Дубны. Археология русской смерти, 2015(1), 169-192.

Brooks, J. (1991). Revolutionary lives: public identities in Pravda during the 1920s. In S. White (Ed.). New Directions in Soviet History, 27-40. Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press.

Walter, T. (1996). A New Model of Grief: Bereavement and Biography. Mortality, 1(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/713685822

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Onipko K. Orbituary as an institutional statement // Folklore and Urban Anthropology. 2025. Vol. 7, no. 1. P. 14–36. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2025-7-1-14-36

Коды статьи

  • EDN WKJFFB
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)